|
|


Recent Case Law
Nebraska Workers' Compensation Decisions of Note
Williamson v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., Neb. App. 642, 682 NW2d 723 (2004)
Facts: Plaintiff sought benefits for injuries allegedly
suffered in a motor vehicle accident on December 23, 2000 while
operating a truck for defendant. During plaintiff's deposition,
he testified that he was hurting after the incident but admitted that
he did not report any injury to the defendant until May 2001.
Plaintiff did testify in his deposition, however, that when he reported
the accident he told his employer he had pain in his back.
Plaintiff went to see his chiropractor on December 26, 2000 and the
office note from this visit indicated that it was related to the
December 23rd incident. Plaintiff, however, did not submit the
bill to the employer or to his own workers' compensation
coverage. Plaintiff did not seek treatment again until May 13,
2001. Based upon the facts presented, the trial judge concluded
that plaintiff's back injury was causally linked to the accident,
however, determined that plaintiff failed to give the required notice
of injury to defendant "as soon as practicable" after the occurrence
and dismissed the claim. Plaintiff appealed and the Review Panel
affirmed.
Issue: Whether notice was provided pursuant to Section 48-133 of the Workers' Compensation Act.
Rule: Notice of injury, not merely notice of an accident, must be
provided as soon as practicable, which is deemed to mean as soon as it
is able to be done.
Holding/Reasoning: In giving meaning to the phrase "as soon as
practicable" the court referenced Webster's Dictionary which defines
practicable as meaning capable of being done, effected, or put into
practice with the available means, i.e., feasible. The trial
court reasoned that because plaintiff promptly perceived substantial
pain that he connected with the event, as was outlined in the
chiropractic notes from the day following the accident, the period from
December to May exceeded the outer limit of any reasonable delay for
providing the employer notice. The court reasoned that it was
practicable for the plaintiff to report the injury within a reasonable
time after he sought chiropractic treatment for the perceived pain and
held that he failed to do so. Therefore, the court affirmed the
findings of the trial court.
|